Chicago 1928
Tap a star to rate
Chicago 1928 spends two short paragraphs building its Prohibition-era premise, then drops it almost entirely for the rest of the site. The whole domain is 5 pages (About us, Event location, Contact us, Downloads, 3D-Tour), mirrored in German and English, and the word "wedding" (Hochzeitsfest in German) appears exactly once on each language version, inside the same sentence that also lists a company party and a Christmas party as equally likely bookings. There is no dedicated wedding page, no dress code, no mention of live music of any kind, and no styled catering menu anywhere on the domain. The theme lives almost entirely in one paragraph of homepage prose, and in a handful of fixed features documented only in a contractor's floor plans, not in a bookable wedding product.
The homepage paragraph does the period-setting work by itself. "The jazz era. The lawless decade. The roaring twenties," it opens, before describing a decade when "speakeasies flourished in response to Prohibition and whiskey flowed in rough quantities." It then pivots straight to the product: "this magic of old Chicago lives on in our rooms," the copy says, and lists what that covers in the same breath: "an extended company party, a fabulous wedding reception or a merry Christmas party." Everything past that sentence is logistics: a floor size, a headcount, a phone number, an enquiry form. The site never claims to be purpose-built for the theme, and never explains why the hall carries the name "Halle 550" at all; both are left unstated rather than invented here.
What the room actually has in it, according to the contractor who drew it up
The strongest evidence for the 1920s theme isn't in the sales copy. It sits in four setup plans linked from the Downloads section, drawn not by Chicago 1928 itself but by smARTec Veranstaltungstechnik AG, an events-technology contractor: a banquet layout for 112 guests, a mixed banquet-and-standing-table layout for 118 (11 eight-seat tables for 88 guests, plus 10 standing tables for 30 more, by the plan's own arithmetic), a maximum banquet layout for 168, and an upper-floor theatre configuration the page links only as "Setup plan C, OG," with no number in the visible link text; the PDF file itself is titled "176 Pax." These are working drawings, made to tell a caterer where the tables go, not to sell anything, and they label two fixed features the marketing prose never mentions once: a walk-in cabinet marked "Humidor Chicago 1928" built into one wall, and beside it a labelled "Tresor," a safe or vault. A humidor and a vault are exactly the two props a speakeasy set would reach for, and they are the only pieces of period imagery documented anywhere on the domain that live in the actual room rather than in a paragraph of homepage prose. The same plans also show a spiral staircase to the upper floor, a bar, a fireplace ("Kamin"), a lounge measuring 2.5 by 3 metres, and a fixed stage measuring 4 by 2 metres, none of it mentioned in the sales copy at all.
The paragraph that sells the room doesn't agree with itself in translation
Past the historical paragraph, the actual pitch for the space is three short lines under "Event location." The English page reads: "High-quality, tailor-made and innovative. On 300 sqm everything revolves around food, drinks and enjoyment." The German original hedges the same figure, "auf rund 300 m2," around 300 square metres, a qualifier the English version drops. Three tags follow. Two match exactly across languages, "exclusive rental for up to 220 people" and "catering & services." The third does not: the German page's third tag reads "Kundenanlässe & Firmenfeiern" (customer events and corporate parties), while the English page, describing the identical room, reads "whiskey & cigar tasting" instead. That's not a missing translation, it's two different claims about what the space is for, sitting in the same layout position on the two language versions; only the English reader is told the Prohibition theme extends to a whiskey and cigar offering, and neither version says whether it is included, priced, or simply available on request.
The 220-person ceiling in that pitch never turns up in any of the four documented layouts either; the highest is 176, in the unlabelled upper-floor theatre plan. That gap could easily be a standing-only format none of the four plans cover, but nothing on the site says so, and a couple relying on the "up to 220" line has no seated or catered configuration on file that actually reaches it.
Entertainment, as far as the site documents it, is a rented photo booth
The only bookable extra beyond the room itself is a factsheet for a "Pixora Photo booth," a third-party rental rather than a Chicago 1928 product: its own copy pitches it at "your corporate event" and promises to "add a special activity to your corporate event that increases the fun factor," with no reference to the 1920s anywhere across its four packages. A Multitalent photo booth starts at CHF 1'500, a video add-on costs CHF 200 more, an AI-photo version with a chosen theme runs from CHF 2'400, and a mirror photo booth from CHF 1'800; all four cover unlimited prints for up to approximately 300 guests and are quoted, arranged and invoiced through Pixora directly, not through Chicago 1928's own team. Nothing about the booth's backdrop or its "custom photo design" option is styled to the venue; a couple wanting flapper-era photography would need to specify it themselves, since the one photo product actually documented on the site is entirely generic.
What the enquiry form and the catering line leave open
Catering is described only as "in-house event catering," offered together with the room rental "from a single source," with no menu, no per-person price, and no reference anywhere to a Prohibition-era food or drinks concept, despite the whiskey mentioned two sections earlier, and only on the English page. The enquiry form itself is identical for every event type: it asks for a budget and a guest count but has no field distinguishing a wedding from a company party, and one of its own dropdown answers to "how did you hear about us" is Lunchgate, a restaurant-review platform, with eventlokale.ch, a general events directory, as another, both read directly from the form's own code rather than assumed. The site never mentions a civil registrar, a symbolic ceremony, or which parts of Swiss marriage law would apply to a booking here; a couple wanting the legal act on the premises has nothing on chicago1928.ch to check that against either way.
Run under a name that never appears on the wedding page
The venue's own address is printed the same way on every page, and even on the Photobooth PDF: "Ricarda-Huch-Strasse, 8050 Zürich-Oerlikon," with no house number. The site's Impressum, its legally required notice, gives a different, fuller address for "Chicago 1928 | Halle 550": Birchstrasse 150, 8050 Zürich-Oerlikon. That same Impressum names the entity behind the site's own legal notices as Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund, Limmatstrasse 152, 8031 Zürich, the umbrella federation of Switzerland's largest retail cooperative. Nothing on the venue's wedding-facing pages says so; a couple booking through the enquiry form has no way to know their contract sits under a supermarket federation's legal department rather than an independent events company.
The verdict
What survives from the Prohibition premise into an actual booking is real but narrow: a humidor cabinet and a vault built into the room, documented only in a contractor's floor plan, plus one paragraph of scene-setting prose that the rest of the site abandons almost immediately. Dress code, live entertainment, a themed menu and even basic ceremony logistics are undocumented; the one bookable extra on file is a generic third-party photo booth with no period styling at all. A couple who wants the 1920s to show up in the room's own fixtures and a well-written invitation line will find exactly that here. Anyone expecting the whole evening built around it, staff in character, a jazz set, a whiskey list to match the homepage's opening paragraph, will find the site itself offers no evidence that it does.