Nemanja Dimitric

Nemanja Dimitric's own site maintains 20 separate landing pages for wedding destinations he wants to be found for: Ireland, Dublin, Morocco, Sicily, Malta, Hvar, Stockholm, Copenhagen, Crete, Dubrovnik, Zanzibar, Rovinj, Mauritius, the Maldives, Seychelles, New Zealand, Lofoten, Oslo, Opatija and Tuscany each get their own permanent page in the site's structure. Switzerland is not among them. The only writing anywhere on the domain that mentions Switzerland lives in a pair of blog posts, a lower shelf of his own SEO setup than a dedicated page, published on consecutive days back in March 2020. That is the honest starting point for a listing that was filed here after being misfiled for years as a Basel venue: this is a working, currently active photographer, but Switzerland is not where his business lives.

Where his business lives is Belgrade, at least according to the location widget on his contact page and the headline on his homepage. His own About page tells a slightly different story, naming Novi Sad as "the place I call home." The site never reconciles them. Either way, he's Serbia-based, and the site is explicit that this is a design-trained, self-taught photographer (he mentions starting his career in design) who moved into full-time wedding work and now runs it as a solo international operation, with a wife, Ksenija, and a daughter, Nora, mentioned in his own bio rather than kept off the page entirely. That kind of detail is a small tell that the About page is written by the person, not farmed out to a template.

The one wedding that actually touched Switzerland

The first of the pair, titled "Basel wedding photographer," describes a real booking: a couple named only as Maja and Dani, who he says had been looking for a wedding photographer in Basel and found him through Instagram. He flew out for what he calls "the place where France, Germany, and Switzerland meet." The couple married on the 10th anniversary of their first kiss, per his own account. Where the story gets more specific than most of this genre is the venue: their civil wedding happened inside Burg Rötteln, a hilltop castle he describes as one of the most powerful fortresses in the region during the Middle Ages. Wikipedia's own entry on the castle confirms it, but places it above Lörrach in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, and describes it today as a ruin, the 3rd largest in the state of Baden, not an intact palace. So the ceremony he calls a "civil wedding" happened on German soil, not Swiss.

The post's own heading then reads "Church wedding and celebration in Germany," but the paragraph underneath it says the church wedding happened back in Basel, and it was the restaurant reception afterward, at a place called Sichtwerk, that was in Germany. The heading and the text under it disagree with each other. Neither error is damning on its own, a couple splitting a wedding day across 2 countries is exactly the kind of trip that gets written up loosely afterward, but it means "Basel wedding photographer" oversells what's actually documented: a single day, split across a German castle ruin, a Basel church, and a German restaurant, for a couple who don't appear anywhere else on the site.

The second post, "Swiss countryside wedding at Salas 137," is Swiss in a different and thinner sense. The couple, named only as Jana and Peter, are described as being from Switzerland, but the wedding itself was held at Salaš 137, a ranch venue the post's own subheading places "under the Vojvodina sky," meaning northern Serbia. Their florist is credited by name, Flamboyant flower design, but nothing about the venue, the ceremony or the guests was Swiss beyond the couple's residency. Both posts' image files sit in the same upload folder, dated March 2020, and the WordPress database itself (queried directly, not scraped) confirms the Basel post went live on March 28, 2020 and the Salaš post the following day. The Basel post's own text calls the wedding "last year," which would put the actual event in 2019, though nothing on the site states that year outright.

Not everything on the blog is this specific. A third post, "Civil Wedding in Montenegro," names no couple at all and reads as a generic legal-requirements guide, registrar fees, document checklists, apostille timelines, the kind of content-marketing piece a destination-wedding blog runs to catch search traffic rather than to document a booking. It's a useful contrast: the Basel and Salaš posts are real, dated, named accounts of actual jobs, while the Montenegro piece is not evidence of anything he's shot. A reader should know the difference before assuming every post on the blog represents a client.

What he actually offers, in his own numbers

His About page carries a stats block: 9 years in the industry, 250-plus weddings shot, 350-plus happy clients, all current as of the page's last edit in April 2025. His FAQ says coverage runs 6 to 15 hours depending on the day, that a second photographer is available on request "if the organization demands it," and that he shoots family formals but deliberately keeps them off social media and out of blog posts, a specific, slightly unusual policy rather than a generic promise. He describes himself, accurately, as writing in comfortable, idiomatic English throughout the site, with a Serbian-language toggle sitting alongside it rather than the other way round, which matters for an audience that needs a supplier who runs contracts and correspondence in English by default rather than as an accommodation.

His pricing is unusually transparent for this catalog. A dedicated price guide, titled "Priceguide Italy" despite containing nothing specific to Italy, lists 4 tiers: a full wedding-weekend package with 2 photographers, a 200-page photo book and a 10-minute highlight video at 5,500 EUR; a 12-hour, 2-photographer collection at 3,800 EUR; a 10-hour, 1-photographer collection with a printed box of 100 photos at 3,000 EUR; and an 8-hour digital-only collection at 2,200 EUR. Extras are itemized too: 200 EUR an hour for additional coverage, 800 EUR to add a second photographer, 600 EUR for a premium photo album. Booking requires a 100 EUR deposit, non-refundable, against a signed contract, first-come-first-served. He delivers 600 to 800 edited images per wedding, with the online gallery ready within a month.

That same price guide, read in its own Serbian translation, quotes identical figures, so the English and Serbian versions of that particular page agree. A separate page, "vodič kroz ponudu," Serbian only and marked for search engines to skip, prices what reads as the same 3-tier structure markedly lower: 2,500, 1,800 and 1,300 EUR against the 5,500, 3,800 and 3,000 EUR above, with the cheapest tier actually including more, a 2-day regional photo excursion the pricier version doesn't mention. Both pages are live right now, and nothing on the site says which one an enquiry from abroad should expect. A couple contacting him from Switzerland would land on the English page and its higher numbers; it's worth confirming in writing what quote applies before paying a deposit.

The verdict

Nemanja Dimitric is a real, currently working destination photographer with a decade-adjacent track record, transparent (if inconsistent) pricing, and specific, checkable service terms, all of which are rare enough in this catalog to be worth something on their own. What he isn't, despite the URL this listing used to sit under, is a Basel-based or Switzerland-specialist photographer: his one Swiss-adjacent job split its ceremonies across a German castle ruin and a Basel church over 6 years ago, and his one Swiss client married in Serbia. A couple planning a Swiss wedding who like his style should treat him as a well-travelled photographer they'd be flying in for a first or near-first Swiss booking, not as someone with a local track record, and should get their price and their travel costs confirmed in writing rather than assumed from the site.